I was extremely interested in Gee's idea of portfolio people, specifically the idea that to be successful in today's job market it is more important to have a variety of diverse experiences than to be very knowledgeable in a narrow field. I found myself identifying with this outlook, particularly as I look back on my own work experiences, where there have been some common elements but where my overall experiences have been much more diverse.
In looking for links between this week's articles, I found myself considering the two MIT articles within the framework of the pedagogies of the Gee piece. Particularly the portion of the Gee article that laid out his Bill of Rights for all children: The right to lots of situated practice, the right to overt instruction, the right to critical framing, and the right to be allowed to produce and transform knowledge not just consume it.
I was interested in the way the Boyd article fit within the right to lots of situated practice. She talked about the difference between the way teens who have internet access at home and those who can only access it in public locations like school or a library participate on myspace. The teens with limited mainly public access still used the site but there experience was much more narrow than those with home access who could spend more time working on their profiles and using the other features of the site to a greater extent. This seemed to be a real world example of situated practice and how it is limited or denied to those from disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds. It also seemed to be an example of how those with access have more chances to produce and transform knowledge, while those with less access are again forced into the more marginalized role of consumers. I also felt that Boyd's discussion of the the creation of a copy/paste culture was a fantastic example of Gee's explanation of the difference between learning and knowledge building. It is unimportant if a teen understands html code as long as he/she knows how to find someone else who does they will still be able to create an awesome profile page.
In the Goldman and Booker article I found myself looking at the case studies as examples of situated practice, overt instruction, critical framing, and the opportunity to create and transform knowledge. The film project in particular served as a beautiful example of how all four of those learning objectives could be implemented in a single classroom experience. I also thought the film project was an excellent example of a community of practice and found myself thinking about Gee's statement that in a community of practice they bond through a common endeavor and not affective ties because it seemed clear from the descriptions of the project that the teens had indeed bonded more of their shared participation in the project first and then through the project they developed affective ties.
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I think that it's interesting to look at the case studies in relationship to the Student's Bill of Rights, and I think, too, that it's a good practice, analyzing for these elements. Being able to analyze someone else's methodology for these elements is important because in recognizing them there, we gain the experience necessary to be more reflective in our own practice.
In making this comparison, I feel like we are doing the same thing with our pedagogy that Amy is asking us to do when looking at the structure of the articles we read, forming our own style and infusing it with the thins that we learn as we go.
I love the way that you framed this response; I'll be honest in saying that I had a bit of a tough time finding connections between the Gee article and the MIT articles, but you're absolutely right. In teaching students to engage with media in the ways that Gee stated, we are creating portfolio people.
I think that you are right in pointing out that Gee's article and Boyd's article both point out the vast differences in the experiences of students in different socio-economic classes. I don't think that that gap will ever fully go away, but any education reform needs to be across the board, not just in rich schools (which is where teachers traditionally have the resources and support to be more experimental). It's a challenging issue, but something needs to happen. This week's class almost made me want to become and elementary school teacher, just so that I could have a greater role in trying to change education. We'll see if anything comes of that...
Post a Comment